Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14326
Hello Nishit any updates about numbers search? it’s been a long time now we stuck on this job ;( I asked site admin to increase funds for that and they done it immediately so you can finish it asap
also any news for N number reservation / unautorized API number purcase issue?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14325Hi Nishit thank you for your reply so all your #14323 regarding Search Improvment task right? Hoping your idea increasing cronjobs will enhance auto search and purcahase numbers on an efficent level so we could buy all the numbers and not loosing any more….
Would you please also suggest when are you planning to look at EN number reservation / unautorized API number purcase issue?
Kind regards Andrey
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14322Hello Nishit your #14321 ” So, it’s possible that when you reserve a number, the purchase cron job might run at the same time, and the number gets purchased.” was it a question or statement.
-
Did you got any break trough with : #14316 “->I am finding the solution and it will take time”
.
-
also have you checked #14320 for: EN project crew also send us a complain saying that one of the vanity number 513.513.WASH was reserverd by PhoneNumbersExperts customer at 4:46PM for 48 hours BUT at 5.27PM has been purcased trouh API by NumberBarn customer. Could you please check how reserved numbers become available for purcasing trough API?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14320Hello Nishit thank you for your updates, we have increade budget for ” ->I am finding the solution and it will take time .” looking forward for your out come;)
Nishit EN project crew also send us a complain saying that one of the vanity number 513.513.WASH was reserverd by PhoneNumbersExperts customer at 4:46PM for 48 hours BUT at 5.27PM has been purcased trouh API by NumberBarn customer.
Could you please check how reserved numbers become available for purcasing trough API?
The EN site admin has a conflict situation as customers addressing some arguments regarding this matter ;(Kind regadrs Andrey
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14315Hi Nishit that was our Job Master Port out Pin please see more details here https://webmaklay.com/master-port-out-pin/.
it is all working now but we do not need new EN customers seeing this field upon their registration all other parameters are good so please just hide that field from mobile site registration page.Please do not break anything else as it is working good so far;)
For Numbers search – any thoughts how we can enhance its func or updates on #14310?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14313Hello Nishit for #14312 , on your screen shot still Master Port Out – just to remind you that master port filed isn’t required while creating new account so please hide this filed on registration as per this screen shot https://webmaklay.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/mobileEN.jpg.
For our Numbers Search Improvement we have found out that the company who’s competing with us also owns web developing company and they have some Russian coders who’s been working hard to wipe all the numbers before us. I hope you can come up with a solution so we can continue obtaining data better than them.
Please let us know if you need any help on anything, i have already suggested to site admin to add more funds to this job as it may take some time to research API as you mentioned and come up with perfect solution on numbers research and auto purchasing.
As my idea is there any way to make a code that we can literally stream their data base and when those that need numbers come take them same moment?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14311thank you Nishit please check if we can do any better, we know that customer paying for extra Nanotel directory so it only handle your code and our tech team ensure that it works on fasetest NMVe drivers so your code works fast but for some reason we still missing numbers ;(
Please check if we may do some othre way around to enhance our code so we can grab the numbers. Do not worry if we take numbers agresevly site admin said we can do that.
thanks for: ” I am working on #14296.”
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14309Hello Nishit we do not have a competitor site but we know that the code they developed seems to be more smarter as they beat us now. The competitor developer aslo does not know our site but by the time they could figure out how to get the numbers packages faster than us.
here are some more details please see what we take:
your code took theseand then for some reason your code took these AGAIN
and now see what our copetitor works and what they took:
below just some of the numbers as there were more
7026030000
7026031000
7026031111
7026032000
7026032222
7026033000
7026033333
7026034000
7026034444
7026035000
7026035555
7026036000
7026036666
7026037000
7026037777
7026038000
7026038888
7026039000
7026039999any idea whay we are going to do?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14305Hi Nishit this is important;
yesterday telecom provider released 10.000 numbers
Your script addition could only capture the following 210.293.6666And we lost 210.293.X000 and most frustrating the script missed:
210.293.7777
210.293.8888
210.293.9999Also your code addition captured 317.777.777X BUT most importantly lost 317.777.7777
As we advised there is an other competitor’s robot wiped all the numbers that we messed below:210.293.7777
210.293.8888
210.293.9999
317.777.7777so someone got a code that works faster than ours and gets all 7777,8888,9999
Now question:
Is is there anything we can do with it? If so is it something about more time to develop a perfect script that will bit our competitor so we can address this matter to the site administration so they could add more budget and you could make this code 100% reliable.Or is it something that you unable to resolve?
Could you please let us know your answer.
Thank youin reply to: Search Improvnement #14304Hello Nishit any updates about #14296?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14303thank you!
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14301Hi Nishit thanks for update, will check with admin regarding their Monday numbers blocks,
please also let me know if you also adjusted #14296 as we need to close this job and we can start https://webmaklay.com/carrier-lookup-api/?
Kind regards Andrey 😉
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14298Hello Nishit,
we can see that you new code addition is capturing numbers much better, thank you for this!
lately we found 6666 detected but we also noted that 9999 got missed for some reason. Would you please check your code for 9999 why it’s got missed and what could be a reasons for that?
Kind regards Andrey 🙂
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14296Hello Nishit how is all going, i can see some more numbers found yesturday, we hoping in Monday as more blocks released on monday, tuesday next week any way we should get it working and close it next week.
Nishit there is one message come from EN crew they ask when we were working on Master PortOut Pin why we did not complete the job on EN mobile site? Please find attached image here: https://webmaklay.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/mobileEN.jpg
1) We agreed to remove Call In Pin but it still remains on mobile site and customers confuced could you please remove it from there?
2) Also Master Port Out Pin we made it works good now but it does not require during new account regestration can you please also remove it from mobile registration side as per screen shot above.Please let me know once done we will start new job.
Kind regards Andrey 😉in reply to: Search Improvnement #14294oh no, it seems it has not been saved as we can not see any messages,
just making sure your code is working well as we can not see much numbers, we still check next week again monday, tuesday hoping it captures numbers for both lan and wirelss numbers.Overweekend will aslo try to prepare an other job for us to start when you finish this so we can start working on an othre job while keep monitoring your code addition.
-
AuthorPosts