Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14309
Hello Nishit we do not have a competitor site but we know that the code they developed seems to be more smarter as they beat us now. The competitor developer aslo does not know our site but by the time they could figure out how to get the numbers packages faster than us.
here are some more details please see what we take:
your code took these
and then for some reason your code took these AGAIN

and now see what our copetitor works and what they took:
below just some of the numbers as there were more
7026030000
7026031000
7026031111
7026032000
7026032222
7026033000
7026033333
7026034000
7026034444
7026035000
7026035555
7026036000
7026036666
7026037000
7026037777
7026038000
7026038888
7026039000
7026039999any idea whay we are going to do?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14305Hi Nishit this is important;
yesterday telecom provider released 10.000 numbers
Your script addition could only capture the following 210.293.6666And we lost 210.293.X000 and most frustrating the script missed:
210.293.7777
210.293.8888
210.293.9999Also your code addition captured 317.777.777X BUT most importantly lost 317.777.7777
As we advised there is an other competitor’s robot wiped all the numbers that we messed below:210.293.7777
210.293.8888
210.293.9999
317.777.7777so someone got a code that works faster than ours and gets all 7777,8888,9999
Now question:
Is is there anything we can do with it? If so is it something about more time to develop a perfect script that will bit our competitor so we can address this matter to the site administration so they could add more budget and you could make this code 100% reliable.Or is it something that you unable to resolve?
Could you please let us know your answer.
Thank youin reply to: Search Improvnement #14304Hello Nishit any updates about #14296?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14303thank you!
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14301Hi Nishit thanks for update, will check with admin regarding their Monday numbers blocks,
please also let me know if you also adjusted #14296 as we need to close this job and we can start https://webmaklay.com/carrier-lookup-api/?
Kind regards Andrey 😉
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14298Hello Nishit,
we can see that you new code addition is capturing numbers much better, thank you for this!
lately we found 6666 detected but we also noted that 9999 got missed for some reason. Would you please check your code for 9999 why it’s got missed and what could be a reasons for that?
Kind regards Andrey 🙂
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14296Hello Nishit how is all going, i can see some more numbers found yesturday, we hoping in Monday as more blocks released on monday, tuesday next week any way we should get it working and close it next week.
Nishit there is one message come from EN crew they ask when we were working on Master PortOut Pin why we did not complete the job on EN mobile site? Please find attached image here: https://webmaklay.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/mobileEN.jpg
1) We agreed to remove Call In Pin but it still remains on mobile site and customers confuced could you please remove it from there?
2) Also Master Port Out Pin we made it works good now but it does not require during new account regestration can you please also remove it from mobile registration side as per screen shot above.Please let me know once done we will start new job.
Kind regards Andrey 😉in reply to: Search Improvnement #14294oh no, it seems it has not been saved as we can not see any messages,
just making sure your code is working well as we can not see much numbers, we still check next week again monday, tuesday hoping it captures numbers for both lan and wirelss numbers.Overweekend will aslo try to prepare an other job for us to start when you finish this so we can start working on an othre job while keep monitoring your code addition.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14291Hello Nishit missing your reply for #14290 as we are checking here and expecting communication from you.
Please let me know if you are busy or no loner on this project we can not wait for ever….in reply to: Search Improvnement #14290Hello Nishit thank you for your reply, i can see your screen shot same thing we can see on the dashboard but for some reason we can not see any numbers comming trough. I think before there were some numbers comming daily but now we can not see any notifications do you know why is that?
Are you still doing anything at your end?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14287we can see some wireless numbers capturing but not seeing any lannumbers
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14286Hello Nishit thank you for your reply will check for improvements and get back to you.
Could you please advice if you added your code addition to both wireless and lan numbers on the project?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14283Hello Nishit we are not hearing anything from you, please confirm if you still working to avoid account terminations
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14282Hello Nishit, so far we have got only two numbers purcased 8888 on last week and today 9999, there should be a big lot of numbers uploaded soon hoping will get desant amout of entries.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14281Hello thank you for explanation it brings more clarity on your new additions. I think we now need to wait for Monday US time that’s when first big numbers blocks being released and then we can see your new addition in action. If everything is going to work as usual from NT admin dashboard but from source code I would suggest to implement your ” updated code, each entry will be handled by a separate individual function” unless it is not worsen situation.
From the information I got currently site admin missing a lot of entries and if your new addition any better and you confident in this – please make your ” updated code, each entry will be handled by a separate individual function” as a default update on NanoTel project.
It is very important for us to make everything ready for next week Monday numbers block release so team will capture their required numbers.
Kind regards Andrey -
AuthorPosts