[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11133

Hello Mark,

Ok, I will add it on the middle Main section of the page.

No, I did not add Gif for now.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11131

Hell Mark,

Updated the design and validation of user detail form, work in progress on api handling.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11129

Hello Mark,

I will update the design and validation today. And will continue on work of API requests.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11127

Hello All,

This design is not implemented on the web, this is just an created html mock which I will implement on web.

and i will also make changes instructed in #11126.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11122

Hello Mark,

Here are the screenshot of new design. Is it ok ?

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11123

Hello Mark,

Please find post #11122

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11121

Hello Mark,

Working on design changes for #11117 , #11119

My question is the user detail will be same for every numbers? or User can set it different for every number?

For #11120 :
So the input cshould be from a file, with comma separated xxxxxxxxx,xxxxxxxxxx,xxxxxxxxxx, ect and as a list above.Could you please check? -> Do we need to create file upload functionality?

Custom Search and Port-in request both are different jobs so we can not combine this. Yes i know both task are on same page but we can not combine this as Custom Search will work on ordered numbers API and The port-in is working with ported-in requested numbers API. Hope I explained it correctly.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11116

Hello Mark,

Please check the newly created form design for User info on click continue button after check eligibility.And inform me if any field need to be added or removed from the form.

For #11113.
Your required changes will be done after the completion of port in functionality.Currently all the thing is enabled because of testing purpose.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11110

Hello Mark,

For #11107 : The check availability section will be visible to the user means there is no needs of click on search icon. Also added validation for the numbers, added the api functionality to auto get Routing option automatically.

For #11109 : Changes had been made.

Work in progress to design of popup form of user data(https://ibb.co/PW1ngpM) like ineliqent.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11104

Hello Mark,

Open this link and check the image

I am just asking from where and which routing option will be use for portin functionality

• This reply was modified 2 years, 4 months ago by Nishit Shan.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11102

Hello Mark,

I have little bit confusion about the routing option of inteliquent page. As shown in video i can’t get the exact point. Will you please explain it in detail to avoid any type of miss-understanding.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11100

Hello Mark,

Have made some up-gradation in Port-In page to check service availability.If the number is already exist in our system and if the API provide availability status 0, then the availability status will be no otherwise yes.
Working on Popup after clicking on Continue button.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11098

Hello Mark,

For Portin :
I made setup for Checking number porting availability.

For Settings page : I made some changes regarding the setting page.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11091

Hello Mark,

No problem for that.

I want to clear my one confusion that

Is the customer can add any number in port-in request or it it only can add from his/her ordered numbers ?

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Voip Repairs 23 #11085

Hello Mark,

Thanks for your reply.

As Video is for inteliquent.

Is the customer can add any number in port-in request or it it only can add from his/her ordered numbers ?

as peerless functionality it does not provide any checking functionality for numbers that can tell us the number is portable or not. Then it will be direct request for peerless?

[Author]

Posts