[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14316

Hello Andrey,

I have made changes for Master Port Out Pin only. I did not make any other code changes; I just hid the Master Port Out Pin because I think it was not described in the original task description, which is why I might not have done this earlier.

For Numbers search – any thoughts how we can enhance its func or updates on #14310?
->I am finding the solution and it will take time .

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14314

Hello Andrey,

I am still finding where the Master Port Out Pin is coming from on the registration form.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14312

Hello Andrey,

I made changes for #14296, check the screenshot for reference https://ibb.co/ZzwYmwM5 .

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14310

Hello Andrey,

I will go through the API documentation to see if there is anything I am missing or if there are any loopholes I can find to beat our competitor. I will also check if there is any technology or package available on the internet or in the coding world that can help us achieve our goal.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14306

Hello Andrey,

I am working on #14296.

For the number capturing problem, and why the competitor is getting most of the numbers, I will need to research and come up with an out-of-the-box solution. The existing code doesn’t seem to have any issues, but I will need to find out what the competitor is doing. I would also like to request the competitor’s site, so that I can try to investigate what technology they are using.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14302

Hello Andrey,

I am looking for post #14296, i will update you once i finish or find need to update you.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14299

Hello Andrey,

I have checked my and and find there is no difference in the code for 6666 and 9999, if 6666 is working then 9999 for should also work.

• This reply was modified 3 months, 1 week ago by Nishit Shan.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14293

Hello Andrey,

I noticed you sent me a message, but it disappeared. Can you confirm if you deleted it, because it is no longer available?

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14292

Hello Andrey,

There is being some problem in our side , that’s why i am not able to update you . Yesterday i was updating the full system for the problem fixing. Now everything is fine and working.

Update: I am not currently working on number search as it was completed from my side, If there is still any issues please know me.

Sorry for inconvenience !

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14288

Hello Andrey,

Please check the link for screenshot (https://ibb.co/1Scz3y2), I made improvement for this list.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14285

In addition to my above message, I also want to let you know that I have completed all the improvements I had planned to do from my side.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14284

Hello Andrey,

I am working on number serach cron functionality. Can you please confirm about any improvement on number search

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14280

Hello Andrey,

Everything will continue to work as it was previously. The only change is that the cron job will now run twice and execute two different function scripts separately. This approach removes the dependency on a single function, helping to reduce the overall execution time and allowing the second script to run without delay.

For example, consider a list of wildcard entries. Currently, all wildcard entries are processed through a single function for number reservation. In the updated code, each entry will be handled by a separate individual function. This ensures that one entry doesn’t have to wait for the previous one to finish, thereby improving performance and efficiency.

I hope you understand my point.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14278

Hello Andrey,

It’s source code addition.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Search Improvnement #14276

Hello Andrey,

Yes, you are right. We already have individual cron jobs for ******8888, ******9999, ******7777, and *****000, and I am repeating the same by creating another cron job for each of them. That’s why I’m asking if the admin wants to add more patterns, should we also create individual cron jobs for those as well?

[Author]

Posts