Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Notification Settings #13008
Hello Andrey,
Port out accept and reject functionality and notification functionality is not been completed and i think some of the task has been removed for the time period.
in reply to: Notification Settings #13006Hello Andrey,
If i correctly remember then there was task like to make interface like inteliquent on port out page where there was import and export functionality on admin port out page, order export functionality and some text changes. And letter i got complain that page loading is taking too much time then i responded that it is because of API taking time to fetch the record. There after mark come with webhook and they were saying why we did not used webhook before and about that we have some chat exchange on that. In this process i also responded that for complete integration of webhook your admin will have to make different budget. Then there after we again exchanged some text message and i integrated webook on admin port-out page on the previous budget and informed mark that now for the user portal my finance team is not allowing me to work .
There is task like reduce loading speed of port out page on user portal and back to portal button. For this i will have to make different functionality which will behave differently and can reduce loading seed.
Concluding remark:
Admin side port out page all functionality done and webhook functionality integrated and loading speed is also as it should , On user portal loading speed is still high.in reply to: Notification Settings #13004Hello Andrey,
I have removed reserved function from code.
Can you please remind me what have you been doing before Notification job? Have you finished port out and Download files?
=> I was working on port-out page for webhook integration changes according to webhook .I have informed mark that the webhook integration will take time and extra budget then he said me to go with notification task first then after will work on webhook integration for portout data.
in reply to: Notification Settings #13002Hello Andrey,
Reservation functionality should not be implemented using current company detail, because it will reduce our number purchasing count. I have to make dynamic functionality and that dynamic functionality will take time in execution and that execution will cause your number loss.
in reply to: Notification Settings #13000Hello Andrey,
Believe me i have not made any changes since last Friday. I think now it is working and purchasing maximum released number.
in reply to: Notification Settings #12996Hello Andrey,
I am trying to understand what exactly they want from me , i will send after getting what they exactly want .
in reply to: Notification Settings #12994Hello Andrey,
Code is working , i did not made any changes in code after since my last update about code completion.
in reply to: Notification Settings #12988Hello Andrey,
I completed my code for notification setting task, and hoping the code is working because i can see there is numbers been purchased and also get notified.
Below are the numbers been purchase:
5513487777,
5513488000,
5513488888,
8659100000,
8653818888in reply to: Notification Settings #12984Hello Andrey,
This is not admin’s mistake.But i still have a question , is there any other who is using nanotel company as root company . Because when they will reserve number then the system will purchase that number also , why i am asking this because i am wondering how these number get reserved if there was no entry for reserve number. If there is other user have account belonging to the nanotel company then please contact them and ask if they are reserving number .
For #post-12983: Ok, I will not do it again.
Can you please confirm if the current code is getting all number and purchasing , because i got number purchased notification mail for many number which we wanted to purchase.
in reply to: Notification Settings #12981Hello Andrey,
Yes, It should not happen again, but i have a complain for the inteliquent and this is the exact reason system purchased unwanted number . I have checked reserved number list on inteliquent number and it was empty then i thought there is no reserved number (but i was already aware that there is some problem in inteliquent dashboard and there might be still reserved number that’s why i sent you post #12969).
Remember once you were able to see reserved number list on dashboard but same time i wasn’t . I think it is problem on inteliquent you can complain to them.in reply to: Notification Settings #12979Hello Andrey,
Please read post #12969.
There is no bug in code nor in inteliquent , it was about to happen.
in reply to: Notification Settings #12970One more very important question:
Is there any one other user with Nano Telecom , because if any user will reserve nay number then the system will purchase that number also . So i request you to tell the admin that the reserve number functionality should not run from anywhere .Because i can see there are many user registered with nanotel root company and i don’t know if they are also using API for reserve.in reply to: Notification Settings #12969Also for the last time they the system will buy all the reserved number exist in system so they will have to handle it manually.And they might get unwanted number purchased
in reply to: Notification Settings #12968Hello Andrey,
Can we still leave notification function on Voip?
yes, You will get notification mail .Please monitor the nanotel work closely today, Because i made changes and hoping it will work now.
Note: Please tell the admin that they will not add any reserve number entry not on voip nor nanotel, other wise the system will buy unwanted number and they can loose there money as it was happened befor.
in reply to: Notification Settings #12963Hello Andrey,
I am getting error message (Your password needs to be updated. Please check your email to reset it.) on inteliquent login.
-
AuthorPosts