Reply To: Stripe Integration

[Andrey]

#16441

Hello Nishit thank you for your reply,
could you please advice what is this 1 serioal number of? could you please remove it we did not have it before and En team do not want to see it there.

i aslo checked your video and can not see you changed buttons and other points mentioned from #16402 below:

1. Down Time task: Yes we will need to updated the coding for those queries to reduce the calls to DB.If you not surpriced then i assume you knew the issue and im now surprised you as exepreieced developer not mentioned that and not updated it as we always ask you to use modern codings and this puts EN proeject under huge risk. So please thoese queries are mentioend in Jeffs report need to be imroved. And as a kindly reminder on ANY tasks we give you we rely on your profecionalism and experience to be able forcast such a truble and risks and implemenet contemporary codings. Now it sounds that we never told you this and we facing this issues builded up by the time:(

P.S System team attached an other document for you with full EN investigation report and possible resolutions to fix it asap. Please find it here.

2. Sand Box: – We can not do anything at this stage really as EN admins did not get back to us about about the time to switch back to Sanbox.

3. Compamy Name as i could see from your video removed from compolsory but if any field missed during regestration does the proper hint displayd (for example ” Phone Number filed is missing “) loading gifs, messages “please wait” and ect? We do not want EN team repeat it again 😉

4. Does all redirects working and centered on the login page? Aslo when email verifications requestsr is everything clear that customers not being confused and do not know that notifications email been sent, and if any processes going behind the sceen customers are aware that processing messages or loading gifs come up. Will the customers know about verification process exeration time and so on?

5. PortOut Validation i could see the process on your video but we still could not see you applied our recomendations about the buttons, allignemnts, font and ect. ( We know that firist time we did not provided such details and you did it as you think is good so no issues with that but now we have got clear instriuctions on changes and thus will add more funds for this task to your EN credit.) Please make this PortOut Validation with better look we know you can:)

6. I noted in your video the popup has now got X close icon, but i aslo noted that when you clicked APPROVE there had been sime time before pop up window actually appeared and there was no any loading gif come up or ” please wait” message apeared. Buttons are still the same and especulay ugl cancell button not been changed:(

It is preety quick process between AProve and pop up but you can see still it takes some time which is DB queries and coding language that we need to do and already mentioned above.

SAMARY

Please Nishit finish all the #16402 points details and please fix the DB/coding issue – those that causing major problems, aftre nanotelecom we will probably get all the DB coddings review and upgarde job – which will need to confirm with EN team as they alwasy belive that during all developemnet we always use new and modern coding technics and this is why they paying for.