Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Content Improvment #15822
Hello Andrey,
Nice catch , actually it was admin side issue which was not showing many IP based on the flag (condition) . I have fixed this and now it is showing .
in reply to: Content Improvment #15813Hello Andrey,
I have reviewed the nanotel code and also checked the logs where I record any issues that occur during execution.
If something like this happens again in the future— which I do not expect— please ask the admin to provide the exact date and time of the incident so I can investigate it more effectively.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15807Hello Andrey,
I have been investigating this from our side and am still looking into the Nanotel issue. However, you mentioned that users are unable to place orders from the CLEC page. I tested it and was able to successfully place an order.
You can refer screen recorded video link for reference:
[video src="https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-06-11%2009-37-04.mp4" /]I am continuing to check the Nanotel part.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15803Hello Andrey,
I will check this and update you. However, I don’t believe the issue is from our side. I will still test it on my end and get back to you as soon as possible.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15801Hello Andrey,
I have used the same template that was used previously. Please check the screenshot for your quick reference: https://ibb.co/BKySYZ5N
in reply to: Content Improvment #15797Hello Andrey,
I have made design changes and added a dropdown. Please check the contact form submission as well as the design.
I tested it using my own email address, and I received the email successfully. Please verify that all respective departments are receiving the emails correctly.
Also, review the design. It looks good to me, but feel free to suggest any improvements if needed.
Please refer to the screen-recorded video for reference:
[video src="https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-06-10%2011-57-56.mp4" /]in reply to: Content Improvment #15789Hello Andrey,
Just an update: Working on contact us page for responsive design and selection based email .
For the nanotel , i will check once i complete this because i don’t want to leave it in half way .
-
This reply was modified 3 days, 8 hours ago by
Nishit Shan.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15785Hello Andrey,
Thank you for your advice regarding the Contact Us page.
Regarding the Nanotel issue, I can assure you that none of our recent changes to the Excellent Number module are related to it, and therefore would not have any impact on Nanotel.
Although I was already confident about this, I reviewed the Excellent Number code again and found no connection. I would also like to confirm that I have not made any changes to the Nanotel code for over a year, possibly even longer.
I kindly request that you do not delete the developer account. I have access to the registered email and will complete the verification.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15781Hello Andrey,
I have fixed the issue with the account.php URL, and it is now working properly. I have also hidden the unnecessary content from the mynumber URL. The issue was caused because part of the mynumber module code was being displayed there.
I also encountered a strange issue. As a precaution, I usually comment out code instead of removing it permanently. However, I noticed that the commented code was still partially executing internally, running incomplete queries and affecting the overall design and layout.
Please check the video for reference i have also included customer lsit part of admin side : https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-06-05%2010-37-19.mp4
in reply to: Content Improvment #15779Hello Andrey,
This issue might be caused by a styling conflict on the Contact Us page. I am currently facing system failures on my side, which is making it difficult to work consistently. Please cooperate for today.
Sorry for the inconvenience !
in reply to: Content Improvment #15774Hello Andrey,
Sorry for being overexcited—I forgot to place the verified status, IP address, and last login date and time correctly on the admin side. Currently, the verified status and last login date/time are showing, but they are not placed correctly.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15770Hello Andrey,
I have completed the Profile Identifier and Registration Verification task .
The registration process has been updated. Below is how it will work going forward:
Users will register and receive a verification email with a verification link. They must verify their email before logging in. If they do not receive or miss the email, they can resend the verification link. Unverified users will not be able to log in—if they attempt to do so, they will see a message prompting them to verify their account, along with a link to resend the verification email.Please note that all previously registered users will also need to verify their accounts before logging in. Kindly confirm whether you would like me to verify all existing users from my end (via a database update), or let users complete the verification themselves.
Additionally, I have made an important change: previously, the welcome email included the user’s email ID and password, which is a significant security and privacy risk. I have removed this. If you still prefer to include the email and password in the verification email for first-time users, I can add it back, but I strongly recommend against it due to security concerns.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15768Hello Andrey,
Please provide all email IDs for support@EN, billing@EN, orders@EN, and the admin for the Contact Us form. I have also upgraded the design of the Contact Us page—please review it as well.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15767Hello Andrey,
I have checked the payment issue with EN credit and found that there was no logical issue. The problem was caused by the jQuery script no longer supporting the older code. I have updated it to the latest supported version, and it is now working correctly.
in reply to: Content Improvment #15763Hello Andrey,
I have updated the response structure from {“status”:”success”,”statuscode”:”200″} to {“statusCode”: 0} as advised in the attached message you sent. Let’s see if it works—please check and inform me, as there was no issue on our side.
-
This reply was modified 3 days, 8 hours ago by
-
AuthorPosts