[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15988

Hello Andrey,

May you please ask your team to integrate ssl for nanotel pro . I am starting work on it from today .

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15986

Hello Andrey,

I have fixed the issue on the CLEC inventory; it was related to a session problem.
I am also sharing a screen recording video for your reference. Please review it and let me know if I have missed any testing scenarios. I have tested it as thoroughly as possible from my side.
I also used your account to ensure everything is functioning correctly.

Screen recording:
[video src="https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-07-06%2011-04-52.mp4" /]

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15975

Hello Andrey,

Please find #post-15974 !

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15974

Hello Andrey,

It’s strange that https://nanotelecom.pro/login is not working with the proper layout, as it is loading perfectly fine on my side.

I am still investigating the CLEC inventory session issue.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15969

Hello Andrey,

Just informing you , I am working on CLEC inventory issue .

Meanwhile, could you please check whether all three tasks that you added to the task list have been integrated? Just review them and share your feedback. Please don’t expect everything to be working perfectly yet—I mainly want to confirm that I’m on the right path before I proceed further with integrating the remaining code.

• This reply was modified 5 days, 1 hour ago by Nishit Shan.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15967

Hello Andrey,

I am surprised why the session suddenly stopped working and is behaving differently. I will check and make the necessary changes, but for today I have some open code scripts on voip/nanotelecom, so let me finish that first. Then I will look into this by tomorrow. I know voip/nanotelecom is not that important at the moment, but I cannot leave the code unfinished.

Just asking—could you please let me know if any updates were made on the server side or if the server was restarted? If something like that happened, it will help me find a proper solution.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15959

Hello andrey,

I have purchased two numbers from the CLEC inventory , one also shown in the screen recording shared in post #15952.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15957

Hello Andrey,

I didn’t find any issue as you mentioned. You can refer to this video—I tried using the same user shown in your screen recording, and I also tested with my own test user, and both are working. You can check both videos from post #15952 and here:

[video src="https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-07-01%2011-42-32.mp4" /]

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15954

Hello Andrey,

Can you please confirm if access to the cPanel or admin panel is not for anyone apart from you, because someone has deactivated the login access and I am not sure who did it.

Also check my post #15952 .

• This reply was modified 6 days, 1 hour ago by Nishit Shan.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15952

Hello Andrey,

Here is a screen recording for reference. Please let me know if I am doing anything differently or incorrectly.
[video src="https://excellentnumbers.com/temp_vid/Screencast%20from%202026-07-01%2010-34-29.mp4" /]

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15951

Hello Andrey,

I am not able to login into admin panel , can you allow me to access .

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15946

Hello Andrey,

Updated plan for Porting Sent Automation:

1. Keep the existing Inteliquent webhook flow as the source of truth.
2. Display port-out items on both the admin and customer porting pages with a dedicated Action column.
3. Add Approve and Reject buttons in that column for each pending row, allowing users to take action directly from the list without opening each record individually.
4. Retain the email links as a shortcut, but not as the only method to respond.
5. When Approve or Reject is clicked, reuse the existing Inteliquent API calls and update the local database status accordingly.
6. When the final “port-out completed” webhook is received, automatically close the record and disable the action buttons.

I believe this implementation plan aligns with your requirements.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15944

Hello Andrey,
This is my plan of integration and i think it is best we can do :

1. Customer’s number enters port-out process on Inteliquent
(could be because they submitted a port-in from another carrier,
or another carrier is requesting to port their number away from VoIP)

2. Inteliquent fires a webhook → VoIP portal receives “Port-out authorization”
(this already works — the webhook handler exists)

3. Automatic email fired to:
Customer: “Your number XXXXXXXXXX is being ported out.
Click [APPROVE] or [REJECT] to respond.”
Admin: “Port-out request received for order #XXXXX.
Customer: [name]. Phone: [number]. Status: Pending.”

4. Customer clicks the Approve or Reject link in the email
→ hits a signed/tokenized URL
→ VoIP automatically calls Inteliquent API (tnPortOutApprove / tnPortOutReject)
→ Status updated in DB
→ Confirmation email sent to customer and admin

5. “Port-out completed” webhook fires → email confirms closure to both

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15942

Hello Andrey,

Thanks for #15940!

Yes, it was a good weekend, and I hope you had a great one as well.

To be honest, it’s a bit funny—part of me feels like I understand your point, while another part thinks I still need to go through it more carefully. Don’t worry, I’m currently working on Laravel packages and handling the other three tasks in parallel.

I will review, discuss, and work further on the redirect logic, as well as the main domain and portal subdomain setup.

[Nishit Shan]

in reply to: Custom Works #15939

Hello Andrey,

Below is my understanding about the task “Porting Sent Automation”

You would like to have a “Send Port-Out Message” button within the Port-Out order detail panel on the admin side (/admin/port_out).

As I understand it, when a customer submits a port-in request (to bring a number onto VoIP), it triggers a corresponding port-out notification on the admin side, since the number is being moved away from its current carrier. Currently, when the admin opens the port-out order details by clicking on an order number, there is no option to communicate with the customer.

You would like to add a “Send Message to Customer” button within this order detail panel to enable direct communication.

Please let me know if my understanding is correct.

[Author]

Posts