Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14333
Hello Andrey,
There is nothing new to update you on. I am currently working on the cron job and I hope to complete it by tomorrow, so you can test it over the weekend..
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14329Hello Andrey,
I think you were right, I messed up #14320 with Nanotel. I will check #14320 also and let you know my update.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14327Hello Andrey,
I am currently working on increasing the cron job efficiency and creating a separate function for each cron job. Apologies for the delay, but as you know, I was reviewing the API documentation for better clarity. Now I am implementing the cron jobs and their functionality, and I will update you once this is completed.
Regarding the reservation/purchase issues, could you please confirm if the reservations are being made using separate user IDs and stored in each user’s individual dashboard? If not, then I would need to assign a unique flag to every number being reserved by me. However, this approach may slow down the reservation process and could increase the chances of losing quality numbers. Since we are already working hard to secure such numbers, I would not recommend using the flag-based approach for reservations.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14323Hello Andrey,
“So, it’s possible that when you reserve a number, the purchase cron job might run at the same time, and the number gets purchased.” : This was my statement .
I am still reading the api documents , still not able to find any thing we can do using api . I am now considering to increase cron job and it’s individual function.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14321Hello Andrey,
If you remember, when I developed the number search and purchase functionality, I informed you that there is a cron job for reserving numbers and another cron job for purchasing all reserved numbers. So, it’s possible that when you reserve a number, the purchase cron job might run at the same time, and the number gets purchased.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14316Hello Andrey,
I have made changes for Master Port Out Pin only. I did not make any other code changes; I just hid the Master Port Out Pin because I think it was not described in the original task description, which is why I might not have done this earlier.
For Numbers search – any thoughts how we can enhance its func or updates on #14310?
->I am finding the solution and it will take time .in reply to: Search Improvnement #14314Hello Andrey,
I am still finding where the Master Port Out Pin is coming from on the registration form.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14312Hello Andrey,
I made changes for #14296, check the screenshot for reference https://ibb.co/ZzwYmwM5 .
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14310Hello Andrey,
I will go through the API documentation to see if there is anything I am missing or if there are any loopholes I can find to beat our competitor. I will also check if there is any technology or package available on the internet or in the coding world that can help us achieve our goal.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14306Hello Andrey,
I am working on #14296.
For the number capturing problem, and why the competitor is getting most of the numbers, I will need to research and come up with an out-of-the-box solution. The existing code doesn’t seem to have any issues, but I will need to find out what the competitor is doing. I would also like to request the competitor’s site, so that I can try to investigate what technology they are using.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14302Hello Andrey,
I am looking for post #14296, i will update you once i finish or find need to update you.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14299Hello Andrey,
I have checked my and and find there is no difference in the code for 6666 and 9999, if 6666 is working then 9999 for should also work.
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 4 days ago by
Nishit Shan.
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14293Hello Andrey,
I noticed you sent me a message, but it disappeared. Can you confirm if you deleted it, because it is no longer available?
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14292Hello Andrey,
There is being some problem in our side , that’s why i am not able to update you . Yesterday i was updating the full system for the problem fixing. Now everything is fine and working.
Update: I am not currently working on number search as it was completed from my side, If there is still any issues please know me.
Sorry for inconvenience !
in reply to: Search Improvnement #14288Hello Andrey,
Please check the link for screenshot (https://ibb.co/1Scz3y2), I made improvement for this list.
-
This reply was modified 1 week, 4 days ago by
-
AuthorPosts